• Recent Posts

  • Tags (Categories)

  • Archives

  • Pages

  • January 2026
    M T W T F S S
     1234
    567891011
    12131415161718
    19202122232425
    262728293031  

Tweets from My Peeps 07/01/09

More Twitter goodness. Links to useful stuff.

mwesch my slides from #pdf09 http://www.mediafire.com/?j… “The Machine is (Changing) Us: YouTube and the Politics of Authenticity”

sherrymn RT @barrydahl: 1st keynote scheduled for EAT-IT 09. Chris Duke followed the theme with: “PLE is Educationally Delicious, EAT-IT!” @cmduke

rww Look Out, Twitpic: Flickr Now Tweeting Images http://bit.ly/ZAO3f

kylemackie #D2L09 via Stephen Downes: “I’m not sure an unconference works at an LMS vendor conference, but it’s worth a try…” http://bit.ly/uGaZj

jclarey How Kids Use Media http://bit.ly/6jVlU (teens not uniquely wired but artifact of larger demographically broader shifts in media behavior)

cburell New post: “The Asians Aren’t Coming! The Asians Aren’t Coming” http://is.gd/1jabn Can we relax yet?

JenniSwenson 35 Awesome Augmented Reality Examples on BannerBlog News http://ow.ly/15Gspo via @tasty_links

tonykarrer del.icio.us: 5 Tips for Creating, Promoting and Managing a LinkedIn Group http://tinyurl.com/lz34bt

presentationzen How to tweet during a presentation? http://bit.ly/lLnqO via @bakadesuyo @DrShock Speaking about Presenting

busynessgirl Wolfram|Alpha can easily plot two graphs with natural language: http://tinyurl.com/m8j4u3

ajwms RT @barrydahl: Finding value in paper about “Edgeless Universities” by Peter Bradwell (Demos) via Jane Hart @c4lpy http://is.gd/1itFL

jasongreen From NY POST – Don’t Get that College Degree http://bit.ly/12CtYM

Web Site Story – CollegeHumor Video

CollegeHumor videos continue to get better and better. I love this one.

Vodpod videos no longer available.

more about “Web Site Story – CollegeHumor Video“, posted with vodpod

Tweets from my Peeps 06/29/09

A few of my Twitter favorites from today. Good stuff from smart people, and a few of my own thrown in for balance.

fncll You’ve prob already seen, but this article on multiple intelligences, genius and wishful thinking hits a sweet spot imo http://bit.ly/zdddW

Starfish360 RT @barrydahl IHE: Comm Colleges & High Schools to create free, online courses in a program being drafted by Obama admin. http://is.gd/1i3AF

shareski Tom Carroll pulling a Prensky, assuming young people are highly connected. They are connected but not really for learning. #necc09

aaronleonard RT @barrydahl DOE report: The use of video or online quizzes – freq encouraged for online education – “does not appear to enhance learning,”

busynessgirl Wolfram|Alpha can easily plot two graphs with natural language: http://tinyurl.com/m8j4u3

ajwms RT @barrydahl: Finding value in paper about “Edgeless Universities” by Peter Bradwell (Demos) via Jane Hart @c4lpy http://is.gd/1itFL

jasongreen From NY POST – Don’t Get that College Degree http://bit.ly/12CtYM

barrydahl New Keynote proposal for EAT-IT 09: “Professionalism and the Jekyll and Hyde Effect” – still accepting more. #EATIT09 http://bit.ly/18372w

barrydahl 3rd Keynote proposal for EAT-IT 09: “Hot Technologies to Change Everything!” Want in on the action? #EATIT09 http://bit.ly/18372w

ReedForCongress Tomorrow is our first financial deadline. Please donate @ http://tinyurl.com/kvcso3 to help show that we can win against Michele Bachmann!

Generation Y – a Huge Baloney Sandwich

baloney-sandwichLast week I experienced one of those keynote speakers that makes me shake my head in disgust – both at what she had to say and at the probable fact that she gets paid a handsome sum of money to say it. I don’t want to call her out personally for a few different reasons, so I won’t mention her name or company – but some people will probably figure out who I’m talking about.

A major part of the presentation was subtitled: “Generational Overview.” She starts out by identifying five different generational groups. Out of those five groups, she felt compelled to make up her own names for four of them. Even Baby Boomers were not called Baby Boomers. To not give further credence to much of her baloney, I will not use her made-up generational names. I will refer to the target generation as Generation Y, although I prefer my own made-up name of Digital Net-Gennials (it is tongue-in-cheek, rest assured).

She starts out by talking about the youngest generation (some (not her) would call them the unimaginative name of Generation Z) and detailing several traits for the group that she identifies as being from 0-13 years old. These traits include:

  1. their brains are different – “physically different!” (forget all that evolution stuff, it doesn’t take millions of years for brains to change, it’s taken less than 13 years to happen)
  2. they are being raised with robots (not by robots, just with robots)
  3. they are THE smartest generation (gee, and they’re barely out of elementary school)
  4. they are the first creative class (does this mean the first group born after Richard Florida’s books were published?)
  5. they dream differently than the rest of us
  6. they’ve already become consumers who demand “do it my way”
  7. they can multi-task at 4 or 5 levels (she hasn’t read Medina’s Brain Rules, has she?)
  8. the sagging economy is causing kids to share bedrooms (where does this crap come from?)

She then shows about 5 or 6 examples of new kinds of schools (some specific such as Benjamin Franklin Elementary in Kirkland, Washington and the Microsoft School of the Future in Philadelphia) as well as how schools are teaching with Web 2.0 tools, SMART board and SMART tables. What an incredible overstatement. Sure this is happening, but at an incredibly low rate of adoption. However, many people in the audience left with the opinion that this whole generation is being immersed in new learning technologies in the elementary and middle schools.

Next she moves on to Gen Y. This section begins with Michael Wesch’s video: “A Vision of Students Today.” Then her slides (fully copyright protected, you won’t find them on the net) go into great detail (err, baloney) about this generation.

  1. They will live 5 to 7 years less than Boomers. (Yep, forget all those advances in medicine, health knowledge, etc.; their average life expectancy has decreased significantly in no time at all- “it’s irreversible!” due to ingested hormones and antibiotics)
  2. This will be a “hero generation” because every fourth generation is one (“research shows”)
  3. Understanding this generation means you understand the future (they are the experts about the Net and all things digital – oh, please!)
  4. They share their knowledge on Wikipedia (really, how many of them write articles on Wikipedia?)
  5. They share their thoughts on Twitter (bull, Twitter users are older)
  6. They share their fantasies on Second Life (again bull, very small % use SL)
  7. They are natural collaborators (natural? as in DNA?)
  8. Innovation is a part of life (they will be innovative heroes, apparently)
  9. They insist on integrity
  10. Kids are now the authority on how to interact with a personal computer (gag me with a two gig stick of RAM)
  11. They think money comes from a wall (I’m not making this up, but she is)
  12. They do not read from left-to-right and from top-to-bottom (really? none of them?)
  13. The last song they listened to on their iPod continues to play in their mind even when they should be listening to you. “Believe me,” she says (I don’t believe her)
  14. They have 4 times the sleep deprivation of previous generations (wow – that’s the average per person for the Gen Y-ers?)
  15. Gen Y has been raised by looking down all the time (Nintendo and other hand-held devices, apparently). Their vision is terrible, especially peripheral vision which has caused more side impact collisions for this generation (where’s this research to be found?)
  16. They are vitamin D deficient
  17. Their immune systems are creating “superbugs” (she cites that the MRSA rate has doubled, but I can’t find any evidence that makes this relevant to the lifestyle choices of young people)
  18. Forget chairs and desks – “They should be learning on the floor – they love it!”
  19. 93% is the magic number – they spend 93% of their time inside and household pollutants are 93% more damaging than outside pollutants (and this presentation is 93% baloney)
  20. This generation believes that the car companies are getting what they deserve for helping to ruin the planet (even Gen Y-ers who grew up in Michigan believe this, according to her)
  21. The whole world (except the island of Fiji) is breathing “China Dust” (Fiji must be well located)
  22. This group will return to the 60s mentality and create a revolution (over green issues, I suppose)
  23. “Their brains are wired differently. There’s tons of research available” (although she doesn’t cite any)
  24. They have a narrow visual field, but “they will see 10 times more things than I will within that narrow field”
  25. “Their jobs will change often, so you should too” (that’s a direct quote – I guess I’ll get my resume’ in order)
  26. They use digital technology 20-30 hours per week. “It’s evolution!” (Yep, first came opposable thumbs and walking upright, then came YouTube)
  27. “They are actually tactilely-deprived” in explaining why Webkinz were a hit with a generation raised in a hard-surfaced environment
  28. They have a greater sense of smell and greater sense of touch compared to previous generations (any data on this?)
  29. “What’s happening in India and China will blow you away” (cited a couple of university engineering programs – another example of picking a few non-representative examples and applying them to the whole population)

I could go on, but those are the highlights gleaned from my 8.5 pages of handwritten notes. The biggest problem that I have with presentations like this is not all the baloney – it’s that this person stands up there as an “expert” and most of the audience members seem to be believing everything she has to say. OMG – this is so wrong on so many levels.

I gave the keynote on the first day and gave just a couple of snippets from my one person debate about Gen Y. I was asked (in advance) to not talk very much about the generations since the day two keynote was all about generations. I obliged, but did have to slip in a few pieces of point-counterpoint about some of the generational drivel that has been driving me crazy. On the long drive home I speculated about what I would have done differently if she had been the first speaker and then I was the second. My guess is that I would have felt compelled to debunk much of the baloney that she was sharing during her talk. I wonder how that would have gone over with the conference organizers – probably not very well.

Am I wrong? Is she right? Can I get a refill on my prescription of crazy pills?

Baloney (or bologna, if you prefer) sandwich photo (CC-3.0) courtesy of UNC – Chapel Hill

Use of I.T. Special Allocation

During the next few days we will be excited to finally open our new Technology Support Center (TSC) at Lake Superior College (LSC). The construction and remodeling have taken much longer than anticipated so several of us are anxious to begin serving students in the new space.

Apparently not everyone shares our enthusiasm. One anonymous college employee has criticized the use of the special I.T. dollars for this project. In particular, this was the second year that each MnSCU campus received additional dollars from the system specifically dedicated for use with local (campus-based) I.T. projects. We call it the “I.T. Special Allocation” although there is probably a more official name for this initiative that I just don’t know about.

The employee stated that using the special allocation for this project was an improper use of funds. I actually can’t say for sure one way or the other, but my interpretation is that we have acted properly. The guidance for the use of these funds comes from a MnSCU memo dated August 8, 2007 with the following subject line: “Guidance on College/University Spending of FY 08 IT Allocation.” The same guidance was used for the FY09 funding as far as I know.

Quoting from the first paragraph: “Your spending allocation should, overall, be consistent with the final legislative language which states: This appropriation includes funding for operation and maintenance of the system, including technology infrastructure improvements to deliver more online programs and services to students.”

Continuing, “Also, in order to ensure that the special IT funding allocation is spent in accordance with the Board of Trustees’ intent, each College or University should allocate this special funding in support of the appropriate institutional efforts in implementing the 8 key projects proposed in the 08-09 legislative funding request. These 8 key projects are consistent with the legislative appropriation language and include: Network and Data Center Modernization, Security Management, Identity Management, Retooled Administrative Systems, New Technology Architecture, Student Services and Online Learning, and Faculty Research and Development.”

The document goes on to define those eight key IT projects within which it would be appropriate to spend the special allocation of money. The two relevant areas in particular are as follows:

  • New Technology Architecture
    • A new, flexible technology architecture will enable innovation and preserve the ability of individual institutions to systematically customize and enhance core, systemwide applications while implementing identified best business practices and preserving data integrity and systemwide business/academic seamless operations. A modular architecture will allow us to realize the benefits of economies of scale while still allowing for institutional variation within an interoperable technology framework.
  • Student Services & Online Learning
    • Investments in our online learning and electronic student services will allow us to keep pace with increasing demand while also expanding access and opportunities for the growing pool of non-traditional learners. Enhancing online functions will go beyond learning and include online career planning, disability services, advising and business functions. Around-the-clock help and support for accessing the new online services will also be provided.

Ignoring the incredible corporate-speak for the moment, I believe that these two categories justify the spending of the dollars on this project at LSC. A little background is probably in order. We opened a new building in August 2007 and in that building is the current Student Technology Center (STC). The STC is an open lab where students can go to get technology help or just to use a computer as needed. There are about 55 computers in the lab. At the time that we opened the lab we heard student complaints (via Student Senate) that the lab was too small and that students had lost open computing space on campus. At the same time we had another space that had been used for several years and was known as our e-Campus which was also the help desk for online students. In other words, there were two help desks, one for on-ground students and one for online students.

Part of the plan that we made to address the Student Senate concerns was to continue to have two open computing labs on campus but only one help desk – sort of a one-stop shop for student help needs with technology. Thus we decided to expand and remodel the small e-Campus space into the adjoining much larger space. That new space is the STC that we are ready to occupy. The other space will be converted into a quiet computing lab – in other words, no help desk services will be available there. Overall, we are attempting to meet the identified student need for more access to technology infrastructure and we believe that we will provide better service to students including our online students.

It’s not much to look at just yet, but in a few weeks it should be a busy hub of activity on campus.

Explosive Turning Point Clickers

Disclaimer: this is not a rant about the TSA. The TSA representative who searched my bag today was very professional, very courteous, and not a jerk in any way. I think he would also agree that I was totally composed, totally calm, and did not make a single snarky remark. But still …

Today while traveling to Traverse City I attempted to to avoid the hassle of checked baggage since I’m only gone for two nights, and since Delta/Northwest is developing a bad habit of sending my baggage to alternate destinations. I’m heading to an ETOM event and it seemed like a perfect time to bring a small carry-on in addition to my laptop backpack and just breeze through the airports without a care. Wrong.

I will be using the Turning Point clickers during my keynote address about Web 2.0 tomorrow at the Higgins Lake Retreat. I needed about 60 of them for this smallish event, which is mainly hands-on except for the keynote. I couldn’t bring the padded case for them since then I would have 3 carry-ons. So, I put about 10 of them in my backpack and placed the rest of them in two ziplock plastic bags in my other carry-on. Sure enough, those little devices looked like a problem to the bag scanner and my bag was pulled out of the line for a strip search.

After I explained to the TSA agent what they were used for, he determined that they needed to be swiped, much like they will sometimes swipe a laptop with a little white cloth disc that does something (or at least they want you to believe that it does). He determined that they needed to be swiped – INDIVIDUALLY. So, I had the pleasure of standing there while he rubbed the cloth over each and every one of the fifty potential explosives. Oftentimes I travel with anywhere from 250 to 400 of those little plastic pieces of nothing. Better arrive at the airport extra early for that next trip.

Of course, this makes about as much sense as the whole ziplock bags for your carry-on liquid containers. You can’t have a container larger than 3.4 ounces (or thereabouts – it seems to change from time to time). So, you can’t bring a 12-ounce bottle of shampoo on board, but you can bring four of those little 3-ounce bottles of the same shampoo as long as they’re inside the ziplock. BECAUSE THAT MAKES PERFECT SENSE.

Two Days in Billings

I spent an enjoyable two days in Billings, Montana (May 6-7, 2009) for a series of faculty development workshops at Montana State University Billings. Tim Tirrell, Director of e-Learning at MSUB brought in Corinne Hoisington (books authored) and myself to work with about 40 faculty members and instructional designers over the two full days. Corinne and I started things off with a shared plenary session that was intended to set the stage for the breakout sessions that we would lead over the next day and a half. The theme for the workshop was using free or low-cost technologies to create content for use within Desire2Learn. MSUB switched to D2L only recently and many faculty were looking for new ways that they could add content and create engaging assignments and projects for their students using Web 2.0 tools and similar technologies. (CC Photo: “Breakfast at Stella’s” in Billings byMike Willis)

Corinne and I work well together because we have complimentary but very different presentation styles and because we each are evangelists for complementary but different tools that can be used effectively in education. Corinne is a proponent of many Microsoft tools as well as several other very useful free tools that primarily fall into the Web 2.0 category – if there is such a thing. I definitely concentrate on how Web 2.0 tools can be used (and are being used) effectively in education settings. After the morning plenary session on day one, we spent that afternoon in two separate three-hour breakout sessions. Corinne led a group through a hands-on demo of several “hot technologies” including Poll Everywhere, Cuil, ChaCha, Slideshare, Google Translate/Latitude/Maps, Newseum, LinkedIn, OneNote screenshots, and more. At the same time I was leading a group through their paces using several tools from my PLE that can be useful for faculty members to provide engaging course content for their online classes, including mindmaps with Mindomo, customized feeds shared through Google Reader and adding RSS feeds into D2L widgets, Delicious and Diigo bookmarking tools, videos and digital photos including several Flickr tools and add-ons. screen capture videos using Screencastle and similar services, and finished with Netvibes as a way to bring all sorts of content together in a single place for student access.

On day two, there were again two separate hands-on, three-hour breakout sessions for participants to choose from. Corrine concentrated on using multimedia to engage students such as OneNote 2007, UStream, Screencast-o-matic, Flip cams, Media Converter and much more audio and video goodness. During the same three-hour time slot I spent most of my time on collaboration and communications tools such as blogs and wikis, Zoho suite of collaborative tools for web office functions, as well as Zoho Creator and Zoho Notebook (both crowd favorites) and Toondoo which is always an eye opener. After lunch, we finished off with a final three-hour tour and allowed the participants to select which session Corrine should repeat and which session I should repeat. That allowed people who missed one of the breakouts (because they were attending the other) to catch up on some of what they missed earlier. That worked out pretty well.

This workshop was coordinated through Innovations in e-Education, a new service from my employer, Lake Superior College. It was basically our first experience of the concept we are calling “Conference Comes to You.” The main difference is that normally the Innovations group does most of the event planning and handles registrations and similar tasks. In this case Tim Tirrell and his MSUB staff took on those tasks since he already knew what he wanted to see happen and had made most of the needed plans.

For the same cost as this two day mini-conference, MSUB could have sent three people to a national technology conference where they could have had a similar experience. Instead this is what occurred:

  • 40 faculty and staff were engaged, including three people from other MSU schools.
  • Attendees spent much more time on task, rather than rushing from one 50 minute breakout session to another.
  • Attendees still had some choices about which sessions to attend.
  • Attendees had a preview of what the sessions would cover so that they could make informed selections.
  • No out-of-state travel concerns.
  • Efficient use of limited professional development funds.
  • Better opportunities for future contact compared to most national conferences.

Next time maybe the conference will come to you. Whaddya think?

Five Quick Picks from my PLE

Desperately searching for a blog post. How about this one? Here are five tools from my Personal Learning Environment toolkit that seem to be either little known, fairly new, or both.

  1. Now that I am using a Mac part-time, I have started using Nambu as my Twitter client. I like it a lot. Since I typically use two screens, I am able to have one screen filled with at least four columns of Twitter goodness – such as a) my Twitter home page (messages from those I follow), b) Tweets where I am mentioned by others, including replies, c) direct tweets that are sent to me privately, and d) those messages I have sent, or my favorites, or a search column, or anything I want in that last column.
  2. I continue to use and am increasingly impressed by the DimDim web conferencing service. We briefly installed the open source version on campus but took it down since we didn’t have time to make it fully operational. I’m hoping to get that back up fairly soon. In the meantime, using the service from their site works very well. They keep turning out enhanced features and their commitment to open source makes them a company that I very much choose to deal with.
  3. I wrote a post recently over at Desire2Blog about Screencastle, a new free, web-based, screen recording tool. It juts works. I like it and recommend it. You don’t even need to create an account – in fact, you can’t.
  4. The more I get to know Prezi, the more I like it. It is a web-based presentation tool that allows for non-linear data representation and all kinds of cool stuff. Because it is so NOT-PowerPoint, it does take a while to break your thinking out of the confines of traditional slideware. Here is a sample presentation where I turned my bio info into a Prezi. You’ll notice that it is still somewhat linear – I’m working on that.
  5. My Mindomo map of Web 2.0 tools has become increasingly valuable to me when making presentations about Web 2.0 goodness. Here is that mindmap – click  on the plus signs to expeand each section. Then there are either further expansions possible or links to the tool websites and examples.

Kill All the Digital Natives

I mean, kill all the TALK about digital natives.

The digital natives/immigrants analogy has been around for most of this century. First reference I have seen is an article by Marc Prensky back in October 2001. Wikipedia defines digital natives as “A digital native is a person who has grown up with digital technology such as computers, the Internet, mobile phones and MP3.”

With all due respect to Mr. Prensky, I think the analogy was a bit off base from the beginning. The idea that a person born into a world after the creation of the various digital medias has some sort of advantage over older people is a bit of a leap of faith for me to make. Many of us old fogies were there when the personal computer was born. We’ve seen and used every iteration of Windows (or Mac OS, or whatever) that has ever come down the pike – both the good and the bad.

In other words: rather than being born into a world where all these technologies existed – we were there when these technologies were born and learned about them from the start – with all the learning and growing pains that are implied therein.

Just take MS Windows – PLEASE!! No, seriously. Consider a person (such as me) who used the first version of Windows (1.0) back in 1986, then became somewhat familiar with versions 2.0 and 2.1, and then really became a Windows user with versions 3.0 & 3.1. Windows 95 changed my world. Windows 98 seemed like another step forward (at the time). I gladly skipped ME, but jumped on board quickly with XP, and had several months of experience with Vista before upgrading back to XP. Not to mention Windows Mobile on my cellphone (yes, I know). So, you’re telling me that my daughter born in 1995 who has never used anything other than Win98 (briefly) and WinXP has some advantages over me when it comes to dealing with an operating system? Not a chance.

I think the same argument applies to multimedia such as audio, video, and several other digital technologies.  Many of us have gone through countless iterations of software, hardware, and other wares in order to learn how to do these things effectively and efficiently. Not everyone in my generation has done so, or even close to it, but plently of people have. There are certain advantages to experience that puts the noobs at a clear disadvantage, at least for a while.

Another reason to stop talking about digital natives and immigrants was recently articulated by Dr. Michael Wesch. Paraphrasing his recent talk in Tennessee, he said that technology is changing so fast that none of us are natives any more. I take that to mean that we’re all in the same boat of trying to keep from falling too far behind the curve and especially to find productive uses of the technologies that are being created and released on a daily basis.

BTW, I’m totally tired of attending one-hour sessions at conferences about the Digital Natives … err Millennials … err Net Gens … err Screenagers (and about 10 other names). Give it a rest. That dog is tired.

CC photo by cesarastudillo

My Web 2.0 Quotient

I used the Web 2.0 Quotient calculator created by Manish Mohan and came with a score of 100. It appears to me that you can score a maximum of 116 if you are at the max on every category.

After calculating my score, I took the time to update my list of free web-based tools on my PLE page. I now have accounts to use 128 different Web 2.0 tools.

CC photo by tobiaseigen